Crying ‘depopulation’ won't stop the jabs—proving criminality in manufacture and distribution would!
Let’s do it!!!
It’s pointless speculating on the motive, if you haven’t investigated the crime
I’m putting this out there in the spirit of stopping the jabs and cooling down the mass hysteria amongst those aiming to profit from wall-to-wall mRNA. It seems that by jumping onto a depopulation agenda, and related NWO objectives, we are missing an open goal in putting an end to all this madness.
How many criminals would go to jail if they were assessed on their motive to commit the crime, rather than the facts and evidence involved with the crime itself? Not many, me thinks. Motivation to commit a crime only emerges during the ‘Inspector Clouseau’ phase—solving the crime must take precedence. By debating it ahead of knowing the facts and sifting through the evidience, the potential outcome seems far bigger than humaity can surmount; but it shouldn’t be.
So, what we must focus our energies on is solving this crime of mass murder, irrespective of motive. Otherwise, we could be debating that until the cows come home, and Bill Gates is killing them off as we speak, so they may never come home :O).
What is the crime?
The crime is that Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna (mRNA) and AstraZeneca/Oxford University (adenovirus vector) have supplied defective products to paying customers. They did that by ignoring practices that have been enshrined in law for decades. In the US, it’s the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21 (21 CFR). In the EU, it’s various Directives, such as:
You don’t have to read it, just be aware that Directives in relation to the licensing of medicines, manufacturers and distributors exist—and they are legally binding.
It may surprise some too, that UKs MHRA is also bound by the EU Directives, even though UK has exited the EU. MHRAs publication Rules and Guidance for Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Distributors 2017, the edition in force during the development, manufacture, and distribution of the SARS-CoV-2 injections, is explicit on the matter. Here is a photo of the relevant page in the Rules above:
MHRA tries to disguise the fact that they must follow EU law, by referencing the Human Medicines Regulations 2012 [S1 2012/1916]. However, the EU Directives trump (lower-case ‘t’) it every time.
The rationale is that if the UK had different rules to the EU, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) would have to inspect the MHRA to ensure it is working to acceptable standards. To my knowledge, that has not happened. If an inspection took place, MHRA would fail on the basis that in January 2022 it changed Regulations for Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products ONLY.
OK, so what’s the bottom line?
Winding back to the defective product argument above, the only way to meet the ridiculously accelerated timescales to get the jabs into people’s arms was to take highly dangerous shortcuts at every twist and turn. This was ‘enabled’ by MHRA issuing Conditional Marketing Authorisations (CMAs). The pharmaceutical industry and its hangers on finished the job off. That’s it, plain and simple.
Stay with me on this to get renewed hope
Hopefully, this has given you renewed hope that the C19 madness can be countered and conquered. In the coming days and weeks, I’ll be explaining the jab manufacturers noncompliances that amount to criminal activity; also, will be sharing the stuff that I can from the various expert witness reports I am writing. This is an example of one I’m working on right now:
By way of example, a public health emergency occurred in 1972,