Spilling the beans on MHRA
...and there's an awful lot in the can!
Touched on this yesterday
Yesterday, I touched on the wonderful work of @ChrisEd16512812 (that’s his Twitter handle) in holding MHRA to account.
Chris’s strategey is simple, yet effective. He convinced me of that a few months ago, when he approached me on Twitter. This is a paraphrase of what he said:
“90% of Court judgements are based on ‘process’ rather than substantive evidence. The complexities of the evidence against mRNA vaccines is substantive in the opinion of many, but very difficult for a Judge to get his head around.
In contrast, a Judge can follow the logic of how a person or organisation did not follow the law, or its own rules, in the case of an organisation.”
For MHRA, there are clear and unequivocal breaches of MHRA’s Rules and Guidance for Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Distributors 2017 (The MHRA Orange Guide).
I have posted about the various MHRA failings in INSIDE PHARMA a number of times—example below:
IF MHRA IS FIT-FOR-PURPOSE, I'M A CREATURE FROM OUTER SPACE
The th…