..."The jury was out four years ago, as to whether any preclinical safety testing was carried out on the SARS-CoV-2 injections. All the evidence now (2025) points to no safety testing being carried out prior to administration to humans."...that is warp speed compared to the 8-13 years it usually should take. The only possible reasons? To fill big pharma's dwindling coffers and MURDER.
The administration announced yesterday they are banning federal funding of Gain of Function research. Seems like the more critical aspect of Covid was rushing untested and contaminated biologics to market. It’s disappointing they don’t want to discuss the safety aspect of the EUAs. In a sane world it seems it would be a priority to address the deaths and injuries due to the 12 month accelerated timeline in which these shots were rolled out,
Yes Alison, gain of function research is not warranted, but it was only part of the China narrative that supported lockdowns and mandatory vaccination.
The crime was using genetically engineered biologics and calling them ‘vaccines’. The Rolling Review they used to approve the jabs ignored the supply chain safety aspects, such as contamination and use of toxic materials etc.
Hedley, the parties involved in this are either pathologically inept or malicious, perhaps both.
You only need to slightly change the shape of a molecule (an isomer) or the folding of an expressed protein; tweak the amino acid sequence slightly. Etc. Tiny changes in the epitopes are all that's needed to make a virus a deadly pathogen Vs a mild infection.
IgG4?
Immunosuppression and cancer?
Homologous epitopes?
Scaled-up process contamination you didn't detect? ;-)
Long term cardiovascular damage because your AI modelling didn't predict the immune complexes through CSR?
To me Doorless, this is the well know systems effect ‘race to the bottom’, where the people involved do evil things justified by ‘the system’. The pharmaceutical system has been breaking for 4 decades, and the only way for it to survive was mass collusion between big pharma companies and their contract research and manufacturing organisations who would have gone broke without them…
Why waste 15 years when you can prototype first, then just tweak the recipe and go to market in just 100 days?
It's the McDonald's Special Ranch Burger business model.
***
100 Days Mission to Respond to Future Pandemic Threats
Reducing the impact of future pandemics by making Diagnostics, Therapeutics and Vaccines available within 100 days. A report to the G7 by the pandemic preparedness partnership.
..."The jury was out four years ago, as to whether any preclinical safety testing was carried out on the SARS-CoV-2 injections. All the evidence now (2025) points to no safety testing being carried out prior to administration to humans."...that is warp speed compared to the 8-13 years it usually should take. The only possible reasons? To fill big pharma's dwindling coffers and MURDER.
Big pHarma pulled our middle leg and nobody even got a kiss
Those who succumbed to the deadly mRNA injections got the kiss of death.
The administration announced yesterday they are banning federal funding of Gain of Function research. Seems like the more critical aspect of Covid was rushing untested and contaminated biologics to market. It’s disappointing they don’t want to discuss the safety aspect of the EUAs. In a sane world it seems it would be a priority to address the deaths and injuries due to the 12 month accelerated timeline in which these shots were rolled out,
Yes Alison, gain of function research is not warranted, but it was only part of the China narrative that supported lockdowns and mandatory vaccination.
The crime was using genetically engineered biologics and calling them ‘vaccines’. The Rolling Review they used to approve the jabs ignored the supply chain safety aspects, such as contamination and use of toxic materials etc.
Hedley, the parties involved in this are either pathologically inept or malicious, perhaps both.
You only need to slightly change the shape of a molecule (an isomer) or the folding of an expressed protein; tweak the amino acid sequence slightly. Etc. Tiny changes in the epitopes are all that's needed to make a virus a deadly pathogen Vs a mild infection.
IgG4?
Immunosuppression and cancer?
Homologous epitopes?
Scaled-up process contamination you didn't detect? ;-)
Long term cardiovascular damage because your AI modelling didn't predict the immune complexes through CSR?
lncRNA epigenetic changes?
Etc
You may not even know what you've done for years.
To me Doorless, this is the well know systems effect ‘race to the bottom’, where the people involved do evil things justified by ‘the system’. The pharmaceutical system has been breaking for 4 decades, and the only way for it to survive was mass collusion between big pharma companies and their contract research and manufacturing organisations who would have gone broke without them…
Old world thinking.
Why waste 15 years when you can prototype first, then just tweak the recipe and go to market in just 100 days?
It's the McDonald's Special Ranch Burger business model.
***
100 Days Mission to Respond to Future Pandemic Threats
Reducing the impact of future pandemics by making Diagnostics, Therapeutics and Vaccines available within 100 days. A report to the G7 by the pandemic preparedness partnership.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/100-days-mission-to-respond-to-future-pandemic-threats