Fascinating article again Hedley. Depop may not have been the prime intention but they continued regardless of manifold harm so there seems to be a disregard of the health implications. Probably amounts to a similar crime.
That's exactly the point Jas. The difficulty with focusing on depop, even if it were part of the plot, is it leaves you without a solution. It gives you a helpless feeling, as big people are doing this to us. The reality i that the people doing this are walking among us. Aside from Mundel, the CEO of MHRA, Ian Hudson, went to work for Gates in 2019 (now 'retired!'). Then MHRA became the 'enabler' of every authorisation for ALL the jabs. The ex GSK VP of Supply Chain on the vaccine task force, Sir Ian McCubbin, is now Chair of the Cell and Gene Therapy Catapult: https://ct.catapult.org.uk/news/press-release-cell-and-gene-therapy-catapult-appoints-ian-mccubbin-obe-cbe-as-chair-of-the-board - McCubbin also has other plum appointments...nice comment Jas, thanks, and what do you think???
The theory that depopulation is the prime motivator, it's very appealing because it's so easy to grok. The problem with it is that it enfolds various people into the supposed "conspiracy" who probably have nothing to do with what's been happening (despite the high status glamor of their positions, they got conned along with most everyone else) and ignores the grubby on-the-ground realities which you point out. I mean to say, I take your point, Hedley.
Still, my intuition tells me there is something— something— to the depop push idea.
Commenters, please don't natter on to me about Bill Gates and depop. I've heard it all before. No, I don't think he's any angel.
Thanks again reader. My honest opinion is that at the very least, the depopulation agenda has not been discouraged on social media- in fact, in the early days there was widespread agreement. I also don’t subscribe to bio weapons designed to kill and injure, with laboratories in the Ukraine and US military doing it. Yes, the jabs were dangerous
- but that is the nature of gene modified cell therapy suck as Novartis’ Kymriah it even says so on FDAs package insert!!!
Hmmm Very interesting and helpful, but at a deeper level, the fundamental delusion is that public health is mass medication. We are finally seeing the end of fluoridation, which was a horrendous wrong. We are seeing the fallacy of vaccination play out on a global scale, but the lessons are clear, if anyone wants to see. Medicine and the healing arts, if they want to be successful are truly individual. Public health should concern itself with nutrition, and food safety, with labor laws, including safe work environments, automotive safety, traffic safety, urban planning even (green spaces, exercise facilities, etc.) In other words, public health is there to protect the individual against the encroachment of the collective, and not the other way around. The very concept of mass-vaccination turns the world on its head, and it is very clear that it is being promoted by military thinking, not by any sincere interest in health.
I owe you a debt of thanks, reader, for suggesting I make all my posts free - my subscriber base has grown like tipsy, and I still have a loyal, core base of paid subscribers 🙏👍👌
Re this statement being made on 14 April 2020: “This new collaboration marks a significant milestone in Sanofi’s and GSK’s ongoing contributions to help fight COVID-19.”
- “As of 19 March 2020, COVID-19 is no longer considered to be an HCID in the UK.”
- “Now that more is known about COVID-19, the public health bodies in the UK have reviewed the most up to date information about COVID-19 against the UK HCID criteria. They have determined that several features have now changed; in particular, more information is available about mortality rates (low overall)…”
- “The ACDP is also of the opinion that COVID-19 should no longer be classified as an HCID.”
So what was the ‘fight’ against COVID-19?
Why was a mass population vaccine response mounted against this disease that wasn’t a HCID, and which had low mortality rates?
Seriously…what was the process for pursuing the vaccine response - who made the decisions and why?
Thanks for another nice comment Elizabeth - always like to hear from you. Yes, I can remember the declassification of COVID-19 down from a HCID. I wondered why nothing changed after, but given what we now know, it's no surprise. The die had been cast long before. UK Government set up the Cell and Gene Therapy Catapult around 2011, about the same time my book for Wiley was published. CAR T therapy was going to get the UK to the top in life sciences., and they began writing policy documents: Strategy for UK Life Sciences:
Ministerial Foreword was written by Rt Hon Andrew Lansley CBE MP, Secretary of State for Health and Rt Hon David Willetts MP Minister of State for Universities and Science.
That is where it all began. I'll be posting more on this later in the week. For now, why don't you have a scan over to get a flavour of how much they were planning for the UK to get up the pole in life sciences....and Bill Gates cottoned on as well, of course.
Another fine catch Alan! Cumming was pivotal in the scam. It turn my stomach when he talks about doing away with regulations meant to keep people free from harm; note also that Craig Murray is a long-term defender of the truth, and has previously gone to jail because it...
Thanks Hedley. I wasn’t aware of Craig Murray. It looks like he was the only follower of Robin Cook’s ‘ethical foreign policy’ which Blair dropped like a ton of hot bricks.
Fascinating article again Hedley. Depop may not have been the prime intention but they continued regardless of manifold harm so there seems to be a disregard of the health implications. Probably amounts to a similar crime.
That's exactly the point Jas. The difficulty with focusing on depop, even if it were part of the plot, is it leaves you without a solution. It gives you a helpless feeling, as big people are doing this to us. The reality i that the people doing this are walking among us. Aside from Mundel, the CEO of MHRA, Ian Hudson, went to work for Gates in 2019 (now 'retired!'). Then MHRA became the 'enabler' of every authorisation for ALL the jabs. The ex GSK VP of Supply Chain on the vaccine task force, Sir Ian McCubbin, is now Chair of the Cell and Gene Therapy Catapult: https://ct.catapult.org.uk/news/press-release-cell-and-gene-therapy-catapult-appoints-ian-mccubbin-obe-cbe-as-chair-of-the-board - McCubbin also has other plum appointments...nice comment Jas, thanks, and what do you think???
The theory that depopulation is the prime motivator, it's very appealing because it's so easy to grok. The problem with it is that it enfolds various people into the supposed "conspiracy" who probably have nothing to do with what's been happening (despite the high status glamor of their positions, they got conned along with most everyone else) and ignores the grubby on-the-ground realities which you point out. I mean to say, I take your point, Hedley.
Still, my intuition tells me there is something— something— to the depop push idea.
Commenters, please don't natter on to me about Bill Gates and depop. I've heard it all before. No, I don't think he's any angel.
Thanks again reader. My honest opinion is that at the very least, the depopulation agenda has not been discouraged on social media- in fact, in the early days there was widespread agreement. I also don’t subscribe to bio weapons designed to kill and injure, with laboratories in the Ukraine and US military doing it. Yes, the jabs were dangerous
- but that is the nature of gene modified cell therapy suck as Novartis’ Kymriah it even says so on FDAs package insert!!!
Hmmm Very interesting and helpful, but at a deeper level, the fundamental delusion is that public health is mass medication. We are finally seeing the end of fluoridation, which was a horrendous wrong. We are seeing the fallacy of vaccination play out on a global scale, but the lessons are clear, if anyone wants to see. Medicine and the healing arts, if they want to be successful are truly individual. Public health should concern itself with nutrition, and food safety, with labor laws, including safe work environments, automotive safety, traffic safety, urban planning even (green spaces, exercise facilities, etc.) In other words, public health is there to protect the individual against the encroachment of the collective, and not the other way around. The very concept of mass-vaccination turns the world on its head, and it is very clear that it is being promoted by military thinking, not by any sincere interest in health.
Hear, hear Rogier...
Thank you for digging all this up! The best investigative reporting isn't in any mainstream media, that's for danged sure.
I owe you a debt of thanks, reader, for suggesting I make all my posts free - my subscriber base has grown like tipsy, and I still have a loyal, core base of paid subscribers 🙏👍👌
Very glad to know this, your work is extraordinarily important.
Thanks!
Re this statement being made on 14 April 2020: “This new collaboration marks a significant milestone in Sanofi’s and GSK’s ongoing contributions to help fight COVID-19.”
But… https://www.gov.uk/guidance/high-consequence-infectious-diseases-hcid
- “As of 19 March 2020, COVID-19 is no longer considered to be an HCID in the UK.”
- “Now that more is known about COVID-19, the public health bodies in the UK have reviewed the most up to date information about COVID-19 against the UK HCID criteria. They have determined that several features have now changed; in particular, more information is available about mortality rates (low overall)…”
- “The ACDP is also of the opinion that COVID-19 should no longer be classified as an HCID.”
So what was the ‘fight’ against COVID-19?
Why was a mass population vaccine response mounted against this disease that wasn’t a HCID, and which had low mortality rates?
Seriously…what was the process for pursuing the vaccine response - who made the decisions and why?
Where is this documented?
Thanks for another nice comment Elizabeth - always like to hear from you. Yes, I can remember the declassification of COVID-19 down from a HCID. I wondered why nothing changed after, but given what we now know, it's no surprise. The die had been cast long before. UK Government set up the Cell and Gene Therapy Catapult around 2011, about the same time my book for Wiley was published. CAR T therapy was going to get the UK to the top in life sciences., and they began writing policy documents: Strategy for UK Life Sciences:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a79762fe5274a2acd18d0b7/11-1429-strategy-for-uk-life-sciences.pdf
Ministerial Foreword was written by Rt Hon Andrew Lansley CBE MP, Secretary of State for Health and Rt Hon David Willetts MP Minister of State for Universities and Science.
That is where it all began. I'll be posting more on this later in the week. For now, why don't you have a scan over to get a flavour of how much they were planning for the UK to get up the pole in life sciences....and Bill Gates cottoned on as well, of course.
"We will take action to make the UK a world-leading place for life sciences investment"
All about industry and investment.
With the people as fodder for a never-ending stream of products.
Meanwhile...actual natural health goes down the drain...
Dom’s father in law was PR adviser to Kate Bingham’s vaccine task force according to the FT in 2020.
https://www.ft.com/content/6159d5b7-171c-49ed-b318-144efcc4ca2a
Another fine catch Alan! Cumming was pivotal in the scam. It turn my stomach when he talks about doing away with regulations meant to keep people free from harm; note also that Craig Murray is a long-term defender of the truth, and has previously gone to jail because it...
Thanks Hedley. I wasn’t aware of Craig Murray. It looks like he was the only follower of Robin Cook’s ‘ethical foreign policy’ which Blair dropped like a ton of hot bricks.
Yes Alan - Blair wouldn't want anything to do with ethical!!!