I think the most important evidence lies in the US data of the first four months of 2020, ending in the CDC decision to stop collecting all case data. With this announcement, the American media announced that the death rate of the vaccinated from COVID was 2 percent. Oddly, they had nothing to say about the death rate of the unvaccinated. It is there. It was 1.82 percent. April 30, 2020, the CDC and the NIH knew the vaccine did not work, not even to prevent hospitalizations or death. The data should still be there.
At that point in time, the US health organizations stopped reporting deaths and hospitalizations by the required formula, a rate, separately calculated for each group, vaccinated then unvaccinated, number of deaths of hospitalizations, divide by total number of cases.
They stopped calculating the rates if the two groups with the required protocols and began to tell the media that the unvaccinated were four times, eight times, etc., more likely to die, by simply comparing total numbers of vaccinated and unvaccinated deaths.
.
Given government and corporations ordered their employees to take the vaccine and then lockdown with their children, this curtailed their exposure to the virus. This group was the vast total of the U.S. population, 80 percent.
Protocol dictated that you could not even compare rates, if the exposure of the two groups was not the same, repeat, the same. It is well established that the deaths and hospitalizations were in the working class, who could not work from home. That this was the entire construct of the false impression the vaccine could give you any advantage at all was clear, when the children went to back to school in September of 2021, and vaccinated hospitalizations and deaths soared way above the unvaccinated, repeat, soared. They increased in February 2022 when corporations went back to work.
There is a peer review document on the proper way to determine vaccine efficacy and safety, which was established for measles, decades ago. It stated it was the blueprint for efficacy and safety determination, and could be used for any other vaccine. It has never been overruled, superceded by another peer review.
Why are professional people, who are questioning the vaccines and their efficacy and safety, not using their best evidence available? Would you like a link to a copy of it?
Note who the lead author in the peer review is, Orenstein. Then research his role in COVID vaccine promotion.
On page four of the peer review note the cardinal rules of efficacy determination, especially what is says about equal exposure.
This document established the current protocol. Just to make sure you know. Medical peer review is just like legal case law, in that it establishes a precedent which can only be overruled by another approved and publish new peer review that defeats it.
Think this document is grounds for pursuit of legal remedy, starting with Orenstein
I think the most important evidence lies in the US data of the first four months of 2020, ending in the CDC decision to stop collecting all case data. With this announcement, the American media announced that the death rate of the vaccinated from COVID was 2 percent. Oddly, they had nothing to say about the death rate of the unvaccinated. It is there. It was 1.82 percent. April 30, 2020, the CDC and the NIH knew the vaccine did not work, not even to prevent hospitalizations or death. The data should still be there.
At that point in time, the US health organizations stopped reporting deaths and hospitalizations by the required formula, a rate, separately calculated for each group, vaccinated then unvaccinated, number of deaths of hospitalizations, divide by total number of cases.
They stopped calculating the rates if the two groups with the required protocols and began to tell the media that the unvaccinated were four times, eight times, etc., more likely to die, by simply comparing total numbers of vaccinated and unvaccinated deaths.
.
Given government and corporations ordered their employees to take the vaccine and then lockdown with their children, this curtailed their exposure to the virus. This group was the vast total of the U.S. population, 80 percent.
Protocol dictated that you could not even compare rates, if the exposure of the two groups was not the same, repeat, the same. It is well established that the deaths and hospitalizations were in the working class, who could not work from home. That this was the entire construct of the false impression the vaccine could give you any advantage at all was clear, when the children went to back to school in September of 2021, and vaccinated hospitalizations and deaths soared way above the unvaccinated, repeat, soared. They increased in February 2022 when corporations went back to work.
There is a peer review document on the proper way to determine vaccine efficacy and safety, which was established for measles, decades ago. It stated it was the blueprint for efficacy and safety determination, and could be used for any other vaccine. It has never been overruled, superceded by another peer review.
Why are professional people, who are questioning the vaccines and their efficacy and safety, not using their best evidence available? Would you like a link to a copy of it?
Please do post a copy, if there is a link. The only point I would add is that all protocols were completely ignored the whole time...
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2536484/pdf/bullwho00089-0084.pdf
Note who the lead author in the peer review is, Orenstein. Then research his role in COVID vaccine promotion.
On page four of the peer review note the cardinal rules of efficacy determination, especially what is says about equal exposure.
This document established the current protocol. Just to make sure you know. Medical peer review is just like legal case law, in that it establishes a precedent which can only be overruled by another approved and publish new peer review that defeats it.
Think this document is grounds for pursuit of legal remedy, starting with Orenstein