mRNA jabs must be stopped—they could never have been sterile from the start—amateurs prepared them and injected them into arms
...and that's just the half of it...
Why did no one question it?
There was no questioning of the SARS-CoV-2 frozen jabs (Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna) even though such a thing had never happened before in the world of pharmaceuticals. Joe public could be forgiven for not picking that up, but regulatory authorities should have, instantly.
Also, the people producing the damn things would have known, because the activities of thawing, combining into solution, and mixing prior to patient administration had always been their job. These are all activities that require training in the skills, working to standard operating procedures (SOPs) written by qualified staff, in a facility designed for the purpose.
Curating willing volunteers to do the ‘production’ in hastily erected facilities, in car parks even, is not what was required, as it could not guarantee that what entered the patient’s body was sterile.
Sterilty is only assured if an injection is produced to Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP), is fully finished and contained as a single unit-dose in a closed carton. The doctor or nurse then only has to take the vial out of the carton and draw the required amount into the syringe and administer.
That is how it always worked, up until the dreaded frozen jabs came along.
I posted an explanation in March 2022:
WHAT IS THE LEGAL REQUIREMENT?
In the post, I shared the legally binding requirements that apply to production (manufacture) of prescription medicines:
Rules and Guidance for Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Distributors 2017
Chapter 5 details the requirements for: PRODUCTION
Principle
Production operations must follow clearly defined procedures; they must comply with Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) in order to obtain products of the requisite quality and be in accordance with the relevant manufacturing and marketing authorisations.
General
5.1 Production should be performed and supervised by competent people.
5.2 All handling of materials and products, such as receipt and quarantine, sampling, storage, labeling, dispensing, processing, packaging and distribution should be done in accordance with written procedures or instructions and where necessary, recorded.
5.3 to 5.16 describes the various obligations that must be observed during production, such as inventory control, production of labels etc etc.
That would make sense, wouldn’t it? Anyone who thinks that these injections are different to any other product that must be made to proper quality standards, should think again.
That’s not too difficult for a judge to understand, is it?
What do you think? Would an honest judge be able to understand the risk of patient harm, even death, given the above?
I think so. All we need now is a willing judge…
Thank you for speaking out. (There were so many, many "tells" on this con.)
I have had a question for some time and I would love your thoughts on it. The question is did the politicians, media stars, the Fauci Medical Mafia et al., and Big Pharma executives, etc. with their well publicized shots actually take the same shots as everyone else? In a hearing before the Australian parliament, Pfizer admitted that their employees took their shots from a dedicated batch. Given your expertise, is there anyway the lay public could figure out if the Publicized Shotsters were actually taking real shots or placebos? One other question, as I am new to your excellent site that you may well have previously answered, why the apparent huge variation in shot adverse event outcomes versus batch numbers? Does the poor quality control that you mention above account for the variance or was it by design to perform real time, liability free human testing? Or both? If this has been previously addressed, could you recommend the best post on this subject? Thanks. P.S. As an old engineer who has been peripherally involved in the manufacturing quality revolution my whole working career, and one that fully supports the critical need for a quality ethic, effective performance management/measurements systems, and continuous improvement in all things, I am excited to follow your site. Thanks for all you are doing.