Thanks for the comment Monica :O). Can you explain a bit more? Why do you think the injections would have been innocuous? Trying to understand more on thinking processes...
If it was all about making money, then they would want as many as possible to take the jabs, and keep taking them ad infinitum with the excuse the virus is mutating etc and the jab is protecting you.. But the injuries and deaths due to the vaxx have become widely known and many people are no longer prepared to take a booster, Faith in the vaccine industry has diminished sharply, including many mothers no longer innoculating their children against childhood illnesses. Vaccines have become suspect overall. Many have now looked at the history of them and no longer believe they work. So pushing a 'covid vaccine' that causes harm is counter productive to their money making scheme
Two things on this. They haven been pushing and making money on drugs forever that do nothing other than harm. The SSRI's are an example. Statins too. They know they can control the science and the media narratives. That is their game. It works. Look at how many people still believe these duds did something.
Secondly I assume there were many that really hoped they had a good recipe and it would work. As Brett Weinstein said, this is an elegant novel technology. There are some decent people in the science community (maybe one or two), an even in government. But, given the lack of track record this was the most reckless clinical decision ever made for the civilian population.
Why use an unproven technology on a 'virus' that was causing no excess deaths? No excess deaths until the vaccine rollout. Look at Boris partying during lockdown. No fear of catching the 'virus', nor any fear from the people he partied with. Why not? What did he/they know that the rest of us weren't told?
I believe the 'vaccines' were toxic by design. The fear mongering was highly sophisticated and extremely well-coordinated, ie it was planned, and in the planning for quite some time. Every trick in the book was used to coerce people into accepting the 'vaccine' quite sickenly so, with unrelenting emotional blackmail and fear of losing your job and being ostracised if you failed to comply. The whole scenario was bizarre and jarring. The longterm harms of the jabbing are not known but the increase in sudden deaths, myocarditis and cancer is unmistakable and ongoing. Fertility has dropped. This is not by accident.
Thanks Monica. One important point. These injections were toxic because the biologics supply chain (they are Biologics) are toxic due to Pharma incompetence, nothing to do with design I can explain more if required. Also, we should ask what is the world population now after 3 years of injections? If it is still roughly the same, they have wasted a huge amount of money and effort for nothing - anyone know the figures?
The supply chains wouldn't have helped. There were too many phials to fill in too short a time. But why use a brand new and unproven technology against a virus equivalent to the flu if it was just to make money? Why vaccinate people when the virus is circulating, if it'sabout their health? Why vaccinate teenagers, children and babies who are resistant, if not immune? Why vaccinate pregnant women? (Unheard of since the thalidomide disaster.) Why the pressure to get the jab into as many arms as possible despite the harms being observed? What other disease required so many jabs EVER? Why make out that the viral mutations were harmful when they get less so as time proceeds? Why was Remdeservir used in US hospitals and Midazolam/morphine in the UK ? The list goes on and on and I could be here all day.
Regarding the global population, there has been an above average increase in deaths in the highly vaccinated countries, and a corresponding decrease in birth rates.
I see your points. The governments had countermeasure implementation and population control systems in place that were rolled out on cue. The disaster planning is ongoing. I was mandated to take their FEMA disaster training as a lowly government contractor. This was all a part of that disaster implementation. Imagine this was a nuclear attack and this was the top down disaster response. Throw in the motivation of the PHARMA goons, and the political brainwashing of the anti-populists to get their product out there and we get what we got, a supra-coordinated disaster implementation with zeal for their plan and disdain for objectors. Don't forget Biden was already at war with us because he hates us - the resistance.
I can't argue with your logic ... long term, no one would have any faith in the 'vaccine' industry ... so therefore their goal ... must be short term ... and that ... succinctly answers this entire thread!
I understand what Monica is saying, if they just wanted to make money why make the vaccines so incredibly toxic? Are they really so stupid/thick to not know they would do so much harm when others in the same industry (such as Mike Yeadon as one example) could see it straight away. I have wondered whether by this point the boosters are just saline solution so they can have people going for them and NOT getting side effects to try and back track and show they were fine all along. On the other hand, I agree with you that the de-pop theory is really depressing. But then we also have the pushing of euthanasia, end of life protocols misapplied etc. A lot of things just don't make sense.
Part of it I suspect was that they desperately needed a whole-population test of the technology that so much had been invested in over the decades but that couldn’t pass an ethical trial. Collateral damage was expected, and accepted, however intense propaganda would keep most on side.
Decades ago, more companies were run by top engineers and scientists. Same with government agencies.
But the CXX and POTUS type of leadership has transformed them. Communication, marketing and acting has become the norm, not intelligence and understanding. And certainly not ethics.
So, I believe there's simply a lot of stupidity everywhere too, where people don't expect it. And even more the custom of gross (over-)simplification and lack of understanding.
And like that, extremely stupid decisions are taken at the highest levels.
Of course this is encouraged by plenty of agents who benefit from that.
There were different interests, Bill Gates wants depopulation, others just wanted more money, even when they already have more than they can spend. The WEF is evil, check out Alliance for Responsible Citizenship, Jordan Peterson.
Since humans are the species who have the biggest influence on the planet's ecosystems, and we already know some of that is destructive, a smaller populations is not of itself bad. To procure that through wars and/or planned genocide, however, would be an obscene notion.
The problem is in Africa and Asia, Europe has a declining population. Perhaps we are experiencing the equivalent of the Fall of the Roman Empire with our lack of discipline, superficial entertainment and selfishness.
Can we get some thoughts on the opioid crisis in the US? The Vioxx/Merck scandal? Thalidomide in the UK/EU and FDAs refusal to approve it? Is this an industry bothered about harming and killing peoples?
In the case of Thalidomide the drug was supplied as a racemate, which contains both enantiomers. These days, following thalidomide, pharma is obliged to look at the separate entantiomers of potential new drugs, from a safety and toxicology standpoint. Had the Distillers Company done this in the 1950s they would have found out that the S-enantiomer is teratogenic, and that the supposedly safe(r) R -enantiomer can be be converted to the teratogenic S-enantiomer in vivo, so pretty much an unsuitable medication, period. Source: Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thalidomide
I feel its about control and money...power. Fit healthy spiritually connected people are much harder to control than sick dissociated depressed people. For years I have watched as people get fatter, sicker and unhappier and All they want is a magick pill to fix it, an opiod, antidpressant, netflix, amazon. The jabs have killed a shit tonne but I feel they have maimed more, im seeing peoples minds profoundly affected, with affects on their health that aren’t so noticeable that they re heading to the doctor or correlating it to the jab, but are enough to affect their daily lifes. If people are struggling to poo, if people are struggling with brain fog, if people are battling extreme ezcema, hormonal dysregulation, detox issues they aren’t going to be as fussed when their jobs get replaced by AI, and they will be grateful when their government comes to the rescue for whatever new problem thats cooked up.
Together we are strong, but if 70% of the population are struggling physically and mentally we have a problem.
Yes, and I would add, it's a terrible burden, both financial and personal, on those who must care for others who are debilitated.
Something else I'm seeing: this constant going to doctors, doctor after doctor, for test after test. What a vast time and money suck. All these prroblems couldn't possibly be connected to the vaccine, doctors say... such a Big Mystery... so let's do some more tests...
Among the very small sample in my personal circles of unjabbed, very definitely, I see an acute awareness that many people they know have developed health issues, or died, after the jabs, and that this burden on relatives who are caregivers is increasing.
However, I live mainly among the multiply jabbed and from what I can see in my personal circles, while many of my "fully boosted" friends are currently overwhelmed with caregiving, and at the same time, dealing with their own recent-onset health problems, they do not see any connection to the "safe & effectives," nope, none, nada, zero. It's all explained by (tick the box): bad luck / getting old / genetics / anxiety / menopause / what God wants / a Big Mystery.
That said, I suspect that there are a few in this group who, privately, turn it over in their minds, that maybe the reason things are more difficult for them now, and they spend so much time toing and froing with medical appointments and tests and the pharmacy, is because of the jabs.
As you know, I make a lot of transcripts of censored and shadow-banned videos. Over and over, I find testimonies of people who were all in on getting "vaccinated" as the responsible thing to do, then they ended up badly injured, or they have a close relative who died or was injured, and then they got the medical gaslighting, and that's what woke them up. I cannot transcribe everything I come across, but in order to convey the magnitude of this situation, I have transcribed a very substantial number of these testimonies. And in sum, I'd say this stands as evidence that yes, there is a growing awareness that many of the healthy and the unhealthy, too, have heavier burdens of caregiving and of having to deal with medical appointments, tests, and hospitalizations, than in times before.
I've picked up on one of your Transcribes: https://transcriberb.dreamwidth.org/43533.html love what you are doing - just to say also, all those people are saying important things, but none of them are 'experts' in the sense that they understand to vast complications in biologics supply chains during development and commercialization. If these jabs were aircraft accidents, aeronautic engineers and aircraft designers would be crawling all over things - not pilots and passengers....!
Thank you for your comment, and thanks also for having a look at the list of transcriptions. It's by no means complete, I'll be adding to it for some time yet-- indeed, there are several individuals who really should be on there and are not yet-- and you have been on my radar for a while now, as I am well-aware that you have a very rare and important expertise without which this criminal fiasco cannot begin to be understood. Please know that I have the highest regard and appreciation for what you have been doing in sharing your knowledge and in speaking out.
That means a lot Transcriber :O) - thank you so much! When my book for US global academic publisher Wiley launches in late summer, it will reveal all. Titled "Transforming the Pharmaceutical Supply Chain", it will be 300+ pages, 4 color, hardback and digital. It's in 3 sections:
SECTION 1 BUILDING A KNOWLEDGE FOUNDATION
” The development of general ability for independent thinking and judgment should always be placed foremost, not the acquisition of special knowledge.”
Albert Einstein
SECTION II: THE BLOCKBUSTER ERA
“Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”
—Albert Einstein
SECTION III: JOURNEY TO TRANSFORMATION
“We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them.”
The agenda has been to create a fertile ground for blockbusters with fast track development and short lifecycle for mass consumption. The prophecies of emerging pandemics were linked frivolously to climate change and zoonosis in order to justify the gain of function research as a solution instead of the cause. To capitalise on the new found deficiency called immunity and mRNA technology as a supplement to correct this deficiency.
That's an intriguing comment Kannan. Can you expand further, especially in relation to "fertile ground for blockbusters with fast track development and short lifecycle for mass consumption."?
The fertile ground is contributed by the continued emergence of novel pathogens, fast track development under the pretext and need for " Emergency use authorisation" with little or no need for long term safety studies, and lastly the variants of the pathogens contributing to products with short lifecycle but assured mass
consumption. On the whole providing quick, low risk and profitable return on investment.
This will be further supported and fueled by the implementation of amended International health regulations and the newly drafted IHR by the WHO.
Exactly - little wonder he, the UK and its Government, is central to the whole deadly scam, along with Farrar, Sykes, GSK, Hancock, Whitty, Vallance, Bingham, Johnson - any more? Who have I missed?
I heard an interesting comment by a financial analyst that I found somewhat alarming, as if anything can shock one in these times. What he said coincided with my own thoughts behind the evil motivations for the Covid saga. Addressing the issue of government debt and potential liquidity crises in the US and other developed nations he casually suggested that a considerable amount of financial assets were held in the estates of lower spending retirees and that perhaps some "black-swan" event could help "solve" this problem and enable a hastened shift in wealth to the next higher spending generations thereby stimulating economies (whilst simultaneously lightening governments of their sosial security debt burdens - my thoughts). As far as I understand most countries in Africa were left relatively untouched by Covid, the destructive mitigation procedures and the Covid vaccines. Africa contrary to most other geographic areas of the world has a relativly young and fast growing populations. South Africa is a rare exception particularly with respect to the older white population who hold a disproportionately large part of the wealth and the country had an aggressive roll-out of everything the Covid "pandemonium" had to offer. A perhaps more nuanced yet equally vile slant to the depopulation theory?
Nuance is exactly what we need, me thinks!!! It seems you are offering evidence that suggests there are counter-arguments to the depopulation theory, while the intention was still 'vile'. Your Africa example seems persuasive, since that would seem to be the best way to get population down quickly. Would welcome more of your thoughts and those of others too, for or against a soley depopulation agenda. :O)
There has always been individuals who entertain the thought of depopulation. Gates and others are just sick enough to make it happen. I think since at least the 80s there has been plenty of people who knew that vaccines can and so harm. Why else would a president give complete immunity to the makers of vaccines that can injury. My son in 2004 suffered a serious reaction to his normal scheduled vaccines. My son is one of the lucky ones who recovered but what I saw no parent should have to witness and even worse the docs telling you it wasn’t the problem. It’s been crystal clear to me since 2004 that is about harming as many especially our male population.
Since my son vaccine injury it’s clear to me. It’s a lot to reference but there are plenty of independent studies that explain how our young males are vulnerable to different toxins. Estrogen appears to be more protective. ADHD and autism it’s prominently in males. Young males in their teens seem to be affected by spike protein.
I was suspicious from the beginning about this Covid scam, something did not add up, I refused the "vaccines". As an former police officer I trust my gut. Well done for exposing this crime against humanity.
My view is that they needed an excuse, a medical emergency, to be able to get permission to inject all this synthetic biotech into people without the normal GMP, safety or efficacy - see Bailiwick News on this. Our MHRA just took FDA word on it, it seems. UK along with US, etc., racing to be leaders in biotech, "personalised health" via AI remote monitoring using body sensors, nanotech stuff seen in vials of different injections, like insulin, dental anaesthetics and many more. Yes, plenty money to be made, many will actually believe in the work, the fact that so many have died or injured is just collateral damage, in the quest to upload our data to the cloud, monitor, get us all digital IDs, put us on CBDC when the financial crash is triggered. People have to zoom out and see the bigger picture to fully understand. The talk of conscripts, mobilising civillians, NATO exercises, expansion of fighting in middle east, all point to another world war. I'd suggest people listen to the Day Tapes, sagehana.substack.com/p/everything-is-in-place-and-nobody and there's been many articles on various people talking of overpopulation and by what means to control it.. Wars are obvious, but damage infrastructure, good for some, like Blackrock in Ukraine, but medical intervention is best - injecting fertile females in Africa/Asia with so called Tetanus jab that rendered them sterile, or giving bad Polio jabs which caused paralysis, leading to single life needing care and no prospects of normal life and raising family. Yes, this time it's on a global scale, but don't be fooled it hasn't been done several times before. It's not greed v depop, it's both, plus control.
I have watched all clips on the subject on Youtube and on uncensored sites,. from Dr.Sam White onwards,. Mike Yeadon and Dolores Cahill have some staggering opinions.. I'm at a total loss as to what is going on,. but if 'Depopulation' is an idea,. then that would be genocide/murder.
Quite so. Much of Dolores Cahill's stance on Covid is disputed. The position she has taken, against evidence to the contrary, raises the question on academic freedom, should it be absolute, or subject to the same provisions as free speech, ie use that freedom wisely and responsibly, as it does not come free of consequences for misuse. She lost her job at Univeristy College Dublin.
I was listening last night to a video by Ben Shapiro and he talked about the memoirs of a German Jew, Victor Klemperer, during Nazi Germany. Ben says Victor records that although they (the Jews) could see the path they were on most preferred to believe that at some point surely things would start to get better because they could not or did not wish to imagine that things could get much worse. So I guess it is human nature to hold on to hope even in the most desperate of times. As for my views I much prefer the comfort of thinking it was just all about greed and power and total incompetance but digging through the historic scientific literature shows ample warnings about the harms caused by mRNA technology so they did know people would be harmed. Also there is a clear agenda to put us all into a global digital prison run by a pharma industrial complex headed by the WHO which is dystopic enough for me to want to run and hide.
Basically his treatment of Candace Owens ... and the fake photo/narrative he ran with ... for full details you will need to search on Bitchute, Rumble, or Odysee
I did hear about it but I don't usually watch Ben - the only reason I watched part of the video I mentioned is because I thought it was a discussion between him and Elon but it wasn't so I only watched the first 10 minutes. My point was about the book not Ben's video. That said I do think however it is good to sometimes listen to those who you may not agree with otherwise you just end up in an echo chamber or as Mattias says another formation.
Early last year, I tried to warn a friend, who is a school teacher, and has two late-teen daughters, and who had moved to live in the South Island of NZ ... about the 'jab' ... and she told me she would 'never' read a right-wing publication ... which was one of the most stupid things I had ever heard another human being say .... and hasn't spoken to me since ...
Her 'woke' insanity was shocking ... but typical unfortunately ...
A healthy mind investigates/listens to everything, and everyone ... and makes rational decisions ...
I could tell similar stories-- just iron-walled nonsensical. It struck me every time that it wasn't any kind of intellectual reaction to the offer of data and information; it more a reaction of mindless horror of impious "pollution."
I only contacted her when I had sufficient irrefutable evidence to present to her ... because most Kiwis are so indoctrinated, I knew she would call me a 'conspiracy theorist' (despite her knowing about my movie blog and acclaim for my 'critical thinking' skills ... I am the only person to decode Ingmar Bergman's 'Persona' - after 50 years of film scholars describing it as their 'Everest' - and six other famous movies)
She told me she watched CNN ... had lunch with her friends ... and was well up to date with 'everything' going on ... ('California Dreaming'!)
I used to like BS ... apart from his 'gerbil' speed mouth ... I thought he was a possible candidate for President one day ... but since he showed his true colors ... I now consider him 'one of them' ... and really scary ...
Did he ... or his family get 'jabbed'? .. I doubt it!
I actually told him about his 'gerbil speed' mouth problem ... wish I hadn't now ... if America is still around, I'm hoping for 'President Candace Owens' in 2032 ... but don't take any notice of my fantasies ...
It’s about depopulation, surveillance, control, breaking down the barriers that prevented use of gene therapy on humans— much money had been invested in this, resetting the economy, as well as a lust to own and control everything.
If we listen to the aspirations of the Bill Gates, he has made no secret of his desire for depopulation of humans and cattle. Gates also has no qualms about genetically modifying God’s creation or spraying our food with toxic chemicals. He seems particularly excited about the prospect of injecting genetically modified concoctions into little kids’ arms.
It should have been obvious that shutting down healthcare and isolating the elderly was never going to benefit them. Regarding the toxic jabs, at best they prioritised experimentation over safety.
If governments are quite happy to fund killing in Ukraine or Israel, then is it really a stretch to imagine that they wouldn’t have a problem poisoning their own population, especially when it’s clear their allegiance is with their friends in Davos and not their own citizens. Currently they are still recommending jabs despite injuries and deaths, and no discernible benefit.
I struggle with the idea of depopulation by mass murder. But every time I see the Gates smirk when he talks about vaccines reducing the global population, it chips away at my belief in humanity. Even if there’s no depopulation agenda, enough people have been careless with public health decisions- gain of function work on viruses in low grade facilities, locking down healthy populations, mandating dangerous untested pharmaceuticals, regulators turning a blind eye to obvious signals of harm - to make it seem like there is one.
If it had just been to make money, the 'vaccine' would have been innocuous
Thanks for the comment Monica :O). Can you explain a bit more? Why do you think the injections would have been innocuous? Trying to understand more on thinking processes...
If it was all about making money, then they would want as many as possible to take the jabs, and keep taking them ad infinitum with the excuse the virus is mutating etc and the jab is protecting you.. But the injuries and deaths due to the vaxx have become widely known and many people are no longer prepared to take a booster, Faith in the vaccine industry has diminished sharply, including many mothers no longer innoculating their children against childhood illnesses. Vaccines have become suspect overall. Many have now looked at the history of them and no longer believe they work. So pushing a 'covid vaccine' that causes harm is counter productive to their money making scheme
Two things on this. They haven been pushing and making money on drugs forever that do nothing other than harm. The SSRI's are an example. Statins too. They know they can control the science and the media narratives. That is their game. It works. Look at how many people still believe these duds did something.
Secondly I assume there were many that really hoped they had a good recipe and it would work. As Brett Weinstein said, this is an elegant novel technology. There are some decent people in the science community (maybe one or two), an even in government. But, given the lack of track record this was the most reckless clinical decision ever made for the civilian population.
Why use an unproven technology on a 'virus' that was causing no excess deaths? No excess deaths until the vaccine rollout. Look at Boris partying during lockdown. No fear of catching the 'virus', nor any fear from the people he partied with. Why not? What did he/they know that the rest of us weren't told?
I believe the 'vaccines' were toxic by design. The fear mongering was highly sophisticated and extremely well-coordinated, ie it was planned, and in the planning for quite some time. Every trick in the book was used to coerce people into accepting the 'vaccine' quite sickenly so, with unrelenting emotional blackmail and fear of losing your job and being ostracised if you failed to comply. The whole scenario was bizarre and jarring. The longterm harms of the jabbing are not known but the increase in sudden deaths, myocarditis and cancer is unmistakable and ongoing. Fertility has dropped. This is not by accident.
Thanks Monica. One important point. These injections were toxic because the biologics supply chain (they are Biologics) are toxic due to Pharma incompetence, nothing to do with design I can explain more if required. Also, we should ask what is the world population now after 3 years of injections? If it is still roughly the same, they have wasted a huge amount of money and effort for nothing - anyone know the figures?
The supply chains wouldn't have helped. There were too many phials to fill in too short a time. But why use a brand new and unproven technology against a virus equivalent to the flu if it was just to make money? Why vaccinate people when the virus is circulating, if it'sabout their health? Why vaccinate teenagers, children and babies who are resistant, if not immune? Why vaccinate pregnant women? (Unheard of since the thalidomide disaster.) Why the pressure to get the jab into as many arms as possible despite the harms being observed? What other disease required so many jabs EVER? Why make out that the viral mutations were harmful when they get less so as time proceeds? Why was Remdeservir used in US hospitals and Midazolam/morphine in the UK ? The list goes on and on and I could be here all day.
Regarding the global population, there has been an above average increase in deaths in the highly vaccinated countries, and a corresponding decrease in birth rates.
Agreed. So does Dr Mike Yeadon.
As one doctor said, Covid was about 10% worse than a bad flu season, it never justified the draconian measures taken.
I see your points. The governments had countermeasure implementation and population control systems in place that were rolled out on cue. The disaster planning is ongoing. I was mandated to take their FEMA disaster training as a lowly government contractor. This was all a part of that disaster implementation. Imagine this was a nuclear attack and this was the top down disaster response. Throw in the motivation of the PHARMA goons, and the political brainwashing of the anti-populists to get their product out there and we get what we got, a supra-coordinated disaster implementation with zeal for their plan and disdain for objectors. Don't forget Biden was already at war with us because he hates us - the resistance.
I can't argue with your logic ... long term, no one would have any faith in the 'vaccine' industry ... so therefore their goal ... must be short term ... and that ... succinctly answers this entire thread!
Short term ... not about money ... Hmmm ....
pb
I understand what Monica is saying, if they just wanted to make money why make the vaccines so incredibly toxic? Are they really so stupid/thick to not know they would do so much harm when others in the same industry (such as Mike Yeadon as one example) could see it straight away. I have wondered whether by this point the boosters are just saline solution so they can have people going for them and NOT getting side effects to try and back track and show they were fine all along. On the other hand, I agree with you that the de-pop theory is really depressing. But then we also have the pushing of euthanasia, end of life protocols misapplied etc. A lot of things just don't make sense.
I would never have recommended those jabs. Simply because of the lack of real useful proven benefits and the many known and unknown risks.
But those jabs being "incredibly toxic" is a perception. And most people don't have that perception.
Plus the people behind these programs do believe in psyops and nudging enough people to continue being users.
Even if 20% drops out they still have 80%.
Part of it I suspect was that they desperately needed a whole-population test of the technology that so much had been invested in over the decades but that couldn’t pass an ethical trial. Collateral damage was expected, and accepted, however intense propaganda would keep most on side.
Decades ago, more companies were run by top engineers and scientists. Same with government agencies.
But the CXX and POTUS type of leadership has transformed them. Communication, marketing and acting has become the norm, not intelligence and understanding. And certainly not ethics.
So, I believe there's simply a lot of stupidity everywhere too, where people don't expect it. And even more the custom of gross (over-)simplification and lack of understanding.
And like that, extremely stupid decisions are taken at the highest levels.
Of course this is encouraged by plenty of agents who benefit from that.
A combination of malice and stupidity.
At least two thirds of the population are below the average intelligence.
There were different interests, Bill Gates wants depopulation, others just wanted more money, even when they already have more than they can spend. The WEF is evil, check out Alliance for Responsible Citizenship, Jordan Peterson.
Since humans are the species who have the biggest influence on the planet's ecosystems, and we already know some of that is destructive, a smaller populations is not of itself bad. To procure that through wars and/or planned genocide, however, would be an obscene notion.
The problem is in Africa and Asia, Europe has a declining population. Perhaps we are experiencing the equivalent of the Fall of the Roman Empire with our lack of discipline, superficial entertainment and selfishness.
Good analogy.
Can we get some thoughts on the opioid crisis in the US? The Vioxx/Merck scandal? Thalidomide in the UK/EU and FDAs refusal to approve it? Is this an industry bothered about harming and killing peoples?
No, they don't care if it doesn't cost them and they make big profits.
Look also at the diethylstilbestrol story (DES). They used similar disinformation and censorship to hide the truth about the risks for decades.
It's simply like Big Tobacco. Only profit counts.
In the case of Thalidomide the drug was supplied as a racemate, which contains both enantiomers. These days, following thalidomide, pharma is obliged to look at the separate entantiomers of potential new drugs, from a safety and toxicology standpoint. Had the Distillers Company done this in the 1950s they would have found out that the S-enantiomer is teratogenic, and that the supposedly safe(r) R -enantiomer can be be converted to the teratogenic S-enantiomer in vivo, so pretty much an unsuitable medication, period. Source: Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thalidomide
I feel its about control and money...power. Fit healthy spiritually connected people are much harder to control than sick dissociated depressed people. For years I have watched as people get fatter, sicker and unhappier and All they want is a magick pill to fix it, an opiod, antidpressant, netflix, amazon. The jabs have killed a shit tonne but I feel they have maimed more, im seeing peoples minds profoundly affected, with affects on their health that aren’t so noticeable that they re heading to the doctor or correlating it to the jab, but are enough to affect their daily lifes. If people are struggling to poo, if people are struggling with brain fog, if people are battling extreme ezcema, hormonal dysregulation, detox issues they aren’t going to be as fussed when their jobs get replaced by AI, and they will be grateful when their government comes to the rescue for whatever new problem thats cooked up.
Together we are strong, but if 70% of the population are struggling physically and mentally we have a problem.
Thanks, nice post 😁 👍
Yes, and I would add, it's a terrible burden, both financial and personal, on those who must care for others who are debilitated.
Something else I'm seeing: this constant going to doctors, doctor after doctor, for test after test. What a vast time and money suck. All these prroblems couldn't possibly be connected to the vaccine, doctors say... such a Big Mystery... so let's do some more tests...
Do you think there is growing awareness of the problem you describe? or no?
Yes, but with important qualifications.
Among the very small sample in my personal circles of unjabbed, very definitely, I see an acute awareness that many people they know have developed health issues, or died, after the jabs, and that this burden on relatives who are caregivers is increasing.
However, I live mainly among the multiply jabbed and from what I can see in my personal circles, while many of my "fully boosted" friends are currently overwhelmed with caregiving, and at the same time, dealing with their own recent-onset health problems, they do not see any connection to the "safe & effectives," nope, none, nada, zero. It's all explained by (tick the box): bad luck / getting old / genetics / anxiety / menopause / what God wants / a Big Mystery.
That said, I suspect that there are a few in this group who, privately, turn it over in their minds, that maybe the reason things are more difficult for them now, and they spend so much time toing and froing with medical appointments and tests and the pharmacy, is because of the jabs.
As you know, I make a lot of transcripts of censored and shadow-banned videos. Over and over, I find testimonies of people who were all in on getting "vaccinated" as the responsible thing to do, then they ended up badly injured, or they have a close relative who died or was injured, and then they got the medical gaslighting, and that's what woke them up. I cannot transcribe everything I come across, but in order to convey the magnitude of this situation, I have transcribed a very substantial number of these testimonies. And in sum, I'd say this stands as evidence that yes, there is a growing awareness that many of the healthy and the unhealthy, too, have heavier burdens of caregiving and of having to deal with medical appointments, tests, and hospitalizations, than in times before.
I've picked up on one of your Transcribes: https://transcriberb.dreamwidth.org/43533.html love what you are doing - just to say also, all those people are saying important things, but none of them are 'experts' in the sense that they understand to vast complications in biologics supply chains during development and commercialization. If these jabs were aircraft accidents, aeronautic engineers and aircraft designers would be crawling all over things - not pilots and passengers....!
Thank you for your comment, and thanks also for having a look at the list of transcriptions. It's by no means complete, I'll be adding to it for some time yet-- indeed, there are several individuals who really should be on there and are not yet-- and you have been on my radar for a while now, as I am well-aware that you have a very rare and important expertise without which this criminal fiasco cannot begin to be understood. Please know that I have the highest regard and appreciation for what you have been doing in sharing your knowledge and in speaking out.
That means a lot Transcriber :O) - thank you so much! When my book for US global academic publisher Wiley launches in late summer, it will reveal all. Titled "Transforming the Pharmaceutical Supply Chain", it will be 300+ pages, 4 color, hardback and digital. It's in 3 sections:
SECTION 1 BUILDING A KNOWLEDGE FOUNDATION
” The development of general ability for independent thinking and judgment should always be placed foremost, not the acquisition of special knowledge.”
Albert Einstein
SECTION II: THE BLOCKBUSTER ERA
“Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”
—Albert Einstein
SECTION III: JOURNEY TO TRANSFORMATION
“We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them.”
Albert Einstein.
thanks again!
H.
.
Your
“Argument”
Is A Distinction Without A Difference.
They Want To Depopulate For More Wealth.
And To Ease The Exertion Of Control.
Wouldn’t You?
( No. I Wouldn’t Either. )
- I really like your work.
The agenda has been to create a fertile ground for blockbusters with fast track development and short lifecycle for mass consumption. The prophecies of emerging pandemics were linked frivolously to climate change and zoonosis in order to justify the gain of function research as a solution instead of the cause. To capitalise on the new found deficiency called immunity and mRNA technology as a supplement to correct this deficiency.
That's an intriguing comment Kannan. Can you expand further, especially in relation to "fertile ground for blockbusters with fast track development and short lifecycle for mass consumption."?
The fertile ground is contributed by the continued emergence of novel pathogens, fast track development under the pretext and need for " Emergency use authorisation" with little or no need for long term safety studies, and lastly the variants of the pathogens contributing to products with short lifecycle but assured mass
consumption. On the whole providing quick, low risk and profitable return on investment.
This will be further supported and fueled by the implementation of amended International health regulations and the newly drafted IHR by the WHO.
Yes, Jeremy Hunt says he wants a 100-day fast-track approval process for new drugs.
Hunt is in the pocket of China.
Exactly - little wonder he, the UK and its Government, is central to the whole deadly scam, along with Farrar, Sykes, GSK, Hancock, Whitty, Vallance, Bingham, Johnson - any more? Who have I missed?
I heard an interesting comment by a financial analyst that I found somewhat alarming, as if anything can shock one in these times. What he said coincided with my own thoughts behind the evil motivations for the Covid saga. Addressing the issue of government debt and potential liquidity crises in the US and other developed nations he casually suggested that a considerable amount of financial assets were held in the estates of lower spending retirees and that perhaps some "black-swan" event could help "solve" this problem and enable a hastened shift in wealth to the next higher spending generations thereby stimulating economies (whilst simultaneously lightening governments of their sosial security debt burdens - my thoughts). As far as I understand most countries in Africa were left relatively untouched by Covid, the destructive mitigation procedures and the Covid vaccines. Africa contrary to most other geographic areas of the world has a relativly young and fast growing populations. South Africa is a rare exception particularly with respect to the older white population who hold a disproportionately large part of the wealth and the country had an aggressive roll-out of everything the Covid "pandemonium" had to offer. A perhaps more nuanced yet equally vile slant to the depopulation theory?
Nuance is exactly what we need, me thinks!!! It seems you are offering evidence that suggests there are counter-arguments to the depopulation theory, while the intention was still 'vile'. Your Africa example seems persuasive, since that would seem to be the best way to get population down quickly. Would welcome more of your thoughts and those of others too, for or against a soley depopulation agenda. :O)
Catherine Austin-Fitts has argued this in several podcast interviews.
Interesting. Where can I find her podcasts?
There has always been individuals who entertain the thought of depopulation. Gates and others are just sick enough to make it happen. I think since at least the 80s there has been plenty of people who knew that vaccines can and so harm. Why else would a president give complete immunity to the makers of vaccines that can injury. My son in 2004 suffered a serious reaction to his normal scheduled vaccines. My son is one of the lucky ones who recovered but what I saw no parent should have to witness and even worse the docs telling you it wasn’t the problem. It’s been crystal clear to me since 2004 that is about harming as many especially our male population.
All that makes sense, until your final sentence- can you expand? You seem to have made a giant leap of logic which I’d like to understand 😁
Since my son vaccine injury it’s clear to me. It’s a lot to reference but there are plenty of independent studies that explain how our young males are vulnerable to different toxins. Estrogen appears to be more protective. ADHD and autism it’s prominently in males. Young males in their teens seem to be affected by spike protein.
I was suspicious from the beginning about this Covid scam, something did not add up, I refused the "vaccines". As an former police officer I trust my gut. Well done for exposing this crime against humanity.
Triple-whammy
Make a shit-ton of money
Get the pensioners (and others) off the payroll
Make patients out of the survivors = more money.
I like it! Honk, Honk!
BOTH! As I outlined in my Corona Investigative Committee presentation, the three primary objectives of the COVID psy-op are:
1) PROFIT
2) POWER
3) DEMOCIDE
• “A Mostly Peaceful Depopulation”: https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/a-mostly-peaceful-depopulation
My view is that they needed an excuse, a medical emergency, to be able to get permission to inject all this synthetic biotech into people without the normal GMP, safety or efficacy - see Bailiwick News on this. Our MHRA just took FDA word on it, it seems. UK along with US, etc., racing to be leaders in biotech, "personalised health" via AI remote monitoring using body sensors, nanotech stuff seen in vials of different injections, like insulin, dental anaesthetics and many more. Yes, plenty money to be made, many will actually believe in the work, the fact that so many have died or injured is just collateral damage, in the quest to upload our data to the cloud, monitor, get us all digital IDs, put us on CBDC when the financial crash is triggered. People have to zoom out and see the bigger picture to fully understand. The talk of conscripts, mobilising civillians, NATO exercises, expansion of fighting in middle east, all point to another world war. I'd suggest people listen to the Day Tapes, sagehana.substack.com/p/everything-is-in-place-and-nobody and there's been many articles on various people talking of overpopulation and by what means to control it.. Wars are obvious, but damage infrastructure, good for some, like Blackrock in Ukraine, but medical intervention is best - injecting fertile females in Africa/Asia with so called Tetanus jab that rendered them sterile, or giving bad Polio jabs which caused paralysis, leading to single life needing care and no prospects of normal life and raising family. Yes, this time it's on a global scale, but don't be fooled it hasn't been done several times before. It's not greed v depop, it's both, plus control.
Thank you!
I have watched all clips on the subject on Youtube and on uncensored sites,. from Dr.Sam White onwards,. Mike Yeadon and Dolores Cahill have some staggering opinions.. I'm at a total loss as to what is going on,. but if 'Depopulation' is an idea,. then that would be genocide/murder.
Bingo!
Quite so. Much of Dolores Cahill's stance on Covid is disputed. The position she has taken, against evidence to the contrary, raises the question on academic freedom, should it be absolute, or subject to the same provisions as free speech, ie use that freedom wisely and responsibly, as it does not come free of consequences for misuse. She lost her job at Univeristy College Dublin.
I was listening last night to a video by Ben Shapiro and he talked about the memoirs of a German Jew, Victor Klemperer, during Nazi Germany. Ben says Victor records that although they (the Jews) could see the path they were on most preferred to believe that at some point surely things would start to get better because they could not or did not wish to imagine that things could get much worse. So I guess it is human nature to hold on to hope even in the most desperate of times. As for my views I much prefer the comfort of thinking it was just all about greed and power and total incompetance but digging through the historic scientific literature shows ample warnings about the harms caused by mRNA technology so they did know people would be harmed. Also there is a clear agenda to put us all into a global digital prison run by a pharma industrial complex headed by the WHO which is dystopic enough for me to want to run and hide.
I wouldn't listen to BS if I was you ... he showed his true colors several weeks back ...
pb
Explain what you mean by 'showed his true colours'.
Basically his treatment of Candace Owens ... and the fake photo/narrative he ran with ... for full details you will need to search on Bitchute, Rumble, or Odysee
pb
I did hear about it but I don't usually watch Ben - the only reason I watched part of the video I mentioned is because I thought it was a discussion between him and Elon but it wasn't so I only watched the first 10 minutes. My point was about the book not Ben's video. That said I do think however it is good to sometimes listen to those who you may not agree with otherwise you just end up in an echo chamber or as Mattias says another formation.
This is what you would call proper dialogue - listening and sharing knowledge - love it, thanks both!
Yes ... very much so ...
Early last year, I tried to warn a friend, who is a school teacher, and has two late-teen daughters, and who had moved to live in the South Island of NZ ... about the 'jab' ... and she told me she would 'never' read a right-wing publication ... which was one of the most stupid things I had ever heard another human being say .... and hasn't spoken to me since ...
Her 'woke' insanity was shocking ... but typical unfortunately ...
A healthy mind investigates/listens to everything, and everyone ... and makes rational decisions ...
pb
Like it!!!
I could tell similar stories-- just iron-walled nonsensical. It struck me every time that it wasn't any kind of intellectual reaction to the offer of data and information; it more a reaction of mindless horror of impious "pollution."
I only contacted her when I had sufficient irrefutable evidence to present to her ... because most Kiwis are so indoctrinated, I knew she would call me a 'conspiracy theorist' (despite her knowing about my movie blog and acclaim for my 'critical thinking' skills ... I am the only person to decode Ingmar Bergman's 'Persona' - after 50 years of film scholars describing it as their 'Everest' - and six other famous movies)
She told me she watched CNN ... had lunch with her friends ... and was well up to date with 'everything' going on ... ('California Dreaming'!)
Now ... I'm a 'ghost'
pb
In what way?
And would you listen to anyone?
Always think for yourself based on information and (better) data you can get from different sources
I used to like BS ... apart from his 'gerbil' speed mouth ... I thought he was a possible candidate for President one day ... but since he showed his true colors ... I now consider him 'one of them' ... and really scary ...
Did he ... or his family get 'jabbed'? .. I doubt it!
I actually told him about his 'gerbil speed' mouth problem ... wish I hadn't now ... if America is still around, I'm hoping for 'President Candace Owens' in 2032 ... but don't take any notice of my fantasies ...
Candace Owens has common sense, a rare commodity these days.
It’s about depopulation, surveillance, control, breaking down the barriers that prevented use of gene therapy on humans— much money had been invested in this, resetting the economy, as well as a lust to own and control everything.
If we listen to the aspirations of the Bill Gates, he has made no secret of his desire for depopulation of humans and cattle. Gates also has no qualms about genetically modifying God’s creation or spraying our food with toxic chemicals. He seems particularly excited about the prospect of injecting genetically modified concoctions into little kids’ arms.
It should have been obvious that shutting down healthcare and isolating the elderly was never going to benefit them. Regarding the toxic jabs, at best they prioritised experimentation over safety.
If governments are quite happy to fund killing in Ukraine or Israel, then is it really a stretch to imagine that they wouldn’t have a problem poisoning their own population, especially when it’s clear their allegiance is with their friends in Davos and not their own citizens. Currently they are still recommending jabs despite injuries and deaths, and no discernible benefit.
I struggle with the idea of depopulation by mass murder. But every time I see the Gates smirk when he talks about vaccines reducing the global population, it chips away at my belief in humanity. Even if there’s no depopulation agenda, enough people have been careless with public health decisions- gain of function work on viruses in low grade facilities, locking down healthy populations, mandating dangerous untested pharmaceuticals, regulators turning a blind eye to obvious signals of harm - to make it seem like there is one.
Bill Gates is the lowest of the low.