Why are you suspicious there is a more sinister purposeful depopulation agenda?
Answers requested here...
Sticking my neck out
Sticking my neck out here you wonderful subscribers. I’m in an email chain with about 30 or so freedom fighters, including Andrew Bridgen, (the only Westminster MP speaking out), Neil Oliver (GB News), Nick Hudson (PANDA) and Kathy Gyngell (TCW), Clare Craig - and others you might know.
The dialogue is around whether there was a depopulation agenda behind the jabs, or was it a money making scam for Mr. Global, Bill Gates, and big pharma in general, as it has not been launching blockbuster drugs for many a year.
Depopulation?
The depopulation followers suggest that fraudulent DOD (US Dept. of Defense) contracts, BARDA/DARPA, and the PREP Act has been behind it all, in a bid to take over the world. What is your view on that? Feel free to suggest why you think it.
Money-making scam?
If you believe it was a money-making scam, with Bill Gates plc et al behind it, then the same applies—feel free to suggest why you think it.
Undecided?
If you are undecided, follow us here to see what’s turned up :O)
Sayin’ no more
I’m not going to say any more until we get some comments back. Hopefully we can begin a fruitful dialogue on the matter.
The depopulation agenda can be traced to 1798, when Malthus published “An Essay on the Principle of Population”. This work inspired Darwin’s “On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life”which, in turn, inspired Darwin’s cousin, Francis Galton, to create a new science “Eugenics” to enable the self-direction of human evolution.
The proliferation of contraceptives by Sanger and Stopes at the beginning of the 20th Century (in the United States and Britain respectively) was motivated by the Malthusian/eugenic agenda. Stopes testified as much under oath in the High Court in London in 1923 when she sued Dr Halliday Sutherland for libel (full disclosure: I am a grandson of Dr Sutherland).
The Malthusians held the fifth “International Neo-Malthusian and Birth Control Conference” in London in 1922. In 1927, the first ever World Population Conference was held in Geneva organised by C.F. Chance, the League of Nations and Margaret Sanger.
In 1928, the Eugenics Society published its first draft of a sterilization bill and got one of its members, Archibald Church MP to propose a bill “to enable mental defectives to undergo sterilizing operations or sterilizing treatment upon their own application, or that of their spouses or parents or guardians” in the House of Commons in 1931.
When the Nazi atrocities, such as the T4 program, came to light, eugenics became “on the nose” and it fell out of fashion. Julian Huxley gave up his position as President of Britain‘s Eugenics Society to head up UNESCO and he intended to rehabilitate eugenics so that it could be discussed again.
When Nazi officials were punished for their eugenics programs, some (many?) were genuinely mystified because many of their measures were not unique to Germany, but were copied from the United States (for instance, their law to sterilize so-called defectives was based on the legislation passed in states like California).
At this point, the US and UK eugenics societies introduced policies of “crypto-eugenics” (ie. secret eugenics) to continue their work. When the Council of Britain’s Eugenics Society resolved to introduce crypto-eugenics in 1960, it simultaneously resolved to contribute to the International Planned Parenthood Federation and the Family Planning Association. It later played a part (in the 1970s) in the establishment of Marie Stopes International - renamed MSI Reproductive Choices in 2020 - which facilitated 4.7 million “safe” abortions worldwide in 2018.
Social historian Ann Farmer (in her book “By Their Fruits”) has shown that abortion reform in the late 1960s was agitated by eugenists and Malthusians.
Crypto-eugenics has led to the airbrushing of eugenics from Britain. For instance, the Eugenics Society resolved to change its name to the less-evocative Galton Institute and in the last few years it has changed its name to the even-less-evocative “Adelphi Genetics Forum”.
The answer to your question is extensive, but what I have tried to show is that the population controllers have been at it for a long, long time.
The way that Hancock’s ‘adult vaccine for adults’ was rolled out to children, babies and pregnant women overriding all ethical considerations suggests there was more than profit-maximisation at play. Once your eyes are opened you see this everywhere
- inadequate care for the elderly during lockdowns
- drug regulators becoming enablers
- attack on farmers and food production capacity
- active promotion of abortion in the USA
- promotion of the ‘climate emergency’ scam leading to higher energy costs, inadequate generating capacity, blackouts and winter deaths
-etc