62 Comments
User's avatar
Dawn 1954's avatar

I directed a local pro life organization for 2 decades beginning in 1989. In my extensive reading, I wanted to understand why abortion was a global push. Once I understood the tactics and propaganda used to market in utero child-killing, it was very easy to identify (lucrative) depop in shoddy or sinister medical practice, chemtrails, toxic edibles, pesticides, toxic chemical disposal, everything injectable (vaxxes and more) and so much more, not excluding of course civil unrest and military war.

I have not had a vaccine in 59 years (am now 71) nor any surgical procedure ever. I take no prescription meds because so far it's been fairly easy to correct problems with natural supplements. I've been hospitalized for 5 childbirths, for which I am grateful, because if I had tried the home birth I wanted at age 39, I would have bled out. Not all medicine is evil, but right now it's damned scary.

Expand full comment
Hedley Rees's avatar

So well said!

Expand full comment
Reader East of Albuquerque's avatar

Re: "Not all medicine is evil, but right now it's damned scary."

Exactly. I am aware of many people all telling the same story where, basically, their loved one goes in the hospital for difficulty breathing and then, over the course of several days or weeks, they're basically murdered (neglect, dehydration, starvation, excessive sedation, and remdesivir). Patients' rights grotesquely violated. First time I heard such a story I didn't believe it. I believe it now. These covid hospital protocols were clearly murderous malfeasance. Did the authors of the covid hospital protocols decide to do this because of a depop plan? Sure looks like it, but I cannot say that I know that. It could simply have been to help improve uptake of the jabs, and meanwhile, make a crapload of money on selling remdesivir.

Expand full comment
CinnamonGirl's avatar

I know hospitals received thousands (I’ve heard as much as 30 thousand) for each Covid patient for use of ventilators and Remdesivir which hospitals gleefully pushed on all C19 admitted patients. Plus, families were given 9 thousand dollars NOT to perform an autopsy which most families took to pay toward funeral expenses. Seems like Big Government trying to reduce the numbers of SS/MC recipients to me.

Expand full comment
Reader East of Albuquerque's avatar

Re: "Seems like Big Government trying to reduce the numbers of SS/MC recipients to me."

My comment: Could be. But it could also not be. It could simply be that the motive was to make a pile from selling remdesivir and, relatedly, from selling the jabs.

But really, I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm saying I don't know. And these days, just because something makes a good story, I'm not necessarily ready to believe it. Call me wary. All the buffalo shale we've been getting from the government and the mainstream media about covid and the covid jabs is stinky enough, but as I see it now, we're also getting plenty of equally ripe BS from those who think they have it all figured out, when all they've done is leapt to appealing (to them) conclusions based on mere wisps of assumptions.

In any event it's relatively easy to slash government spending on benefits without going to the trouble of murdering people. One way is that the government can just print money—and then, sooner or later, and usually sooner, inflation does the trick nicely. So pensioners are still getting 100 dollars, say, but it can only buy what 10 dollars used to buy. And when people don't like higher prices, government officials can always blame "those greedy price gougers," those "greedy ones" being whatever group they want to oppress or get rid of.

Expand full comment
Jean Pierre LaRocque's avatar

I totally agree! Scary.....what are they taught university/ do nno harm???

Expand full comment
Phil's avatar

Depopulate the world whilst making a buck on the side and grabbing all the assets as people die or go broke all under the cover of WW3...they have told us what they are doing - we just didn't pay attention

Expand full comment
LWB's avatar

Seems like both to me

Expand full comment
Diana Mara Henry's avatar

Why do we have to choose, as the author asks us to?

Expand full comment
Christoph Q.'s avatar

I think this question (and especially the "still") presents a falsely suggestive alternative: money or population reduction. If oligarchs want as much control as possible over the monetary system, and over the people, and over the economy, and over the power system and ..., then one can answer twice: "yes, but more precisely..."

On the other hand, I have little doubt that the C19 event was "staged," and the measures, and the injections, were harmful by design.

Expand full comment
Jeanette Johnson's avatar

By removing all the elderly, who worked in manufacturing, we lose well trained people whom would be able to train the younger generations.

Expand full comment
Simon Timmins's avatar

My guess is that the first world countries realised a long time ago that they can’t afford to pay pensions anymore , due to everyone living longer. A virus that conveniently kills off older people would help a lot.

Expand full comment
Diana Mara Henry's avatar

A virus and an injection "to protect the most vulnerable" (aged, immune compromised)...

The fact that few authors of the Great Barrington Declaration have not withdrawn their signatures compromises them as well.

Expand full comment
Brenda Zepp's avatar

I definitely think there is more to the COVID plot than has been revealed. I just can't seem to reason why it was so critically important to inject as many people as possible? That was obviously the goal and it wasn't done to protect from a virus. The bigger picture.....

Expand full comment
Jeanette Johnson's avatar

Both, jabs to kill you, or to keep you sick, with big money being made at your expense. I see many in our local restaurants, elderly friends, who are passing due to many of the jab effects, and many with surgeries being done, all those jabbed are the ones who are having the issues, we unvaxed are watching and shaking our heads. They just think it’s because of their age, and has nothing to do with their vax.

Expand full comment
Hilary Butler's avatar

A lot of unjabbed are having issues as well due to the huge stresses imposed and social dislocation. I know two unjabbed, - married - husband died of cancer two years ago, wife died last week.

Lots of thoughts in my head about how and why.. don't know their health details... hard to speculate.

Expand full comment
Jeanette Johnson's avatar

The only one I know with issues after catching c19 is my son-in-law, and he had issues before he got c19. All the coworkers, friends and family, that got vaxed, and have issues, or passed away, and I would estimate about 4 passed, and 8 are with cancer, or other health problems, the diner we usually eat at, has lost 3 or 4 customers in 1 year, that where vaxed.

Expand full comment
Jeroen.'s avatar

Depopulation agenda, for more than half a century now. Rockefeller, Club of Rome, man is bad for climate, Bill Gates, vaccines to reduce overpopulation. Even worse, these visionair billionaires are also making big money from it by making the population pay for their own extinction through their taxpayers money. Just like wars: they're also often generated by propaganda. Why think that no sensible person would do such a thing? Evil exists just as well. Ask yourself why NATO had, has to be involved in world health. Pandemic preparedness is the propaganda frase for it. Covid was clearly a worldwide military psyop.

Expand full comment
Karin's avatar

In my opinion, the depopulation goal is foremost with wealth generation a secondary bonus. I think the depopulation/eugenics ideology has moved from those humans considered insane/sick/low IQ to everyone, outside the upper echelons of the technocratic managerial hierarchy, now considered disposable. In my opinion, the strands of the depop system are being trialled for their effectiveness including MAID in Canada, ongoing threats of ‘pandemics’ in Central Africa, toxic injectables, eating manufactured meat/bugs because ‘climate change’ etc. The daily psychological onslaught using fear is creating less mental and physical resilience in the young and has increased risk taking behaviours/habits - an increase in drug taking being the most obvious to me.

Expand full comment
Fiona Walker's avatar

A bit of both. Despatch, or give cover for despatching in other ways, the “useless eaters”. Damage the immune systems of younger groups so that they are still productive but require endless further jabs or drugs to keep them ticking over. Kerching!

Expand full comment
Thomas Welch's avatar

Multiple purposes for multiple interest groups. Bloomberg and Gates wanted depopulation, but also profit and control and mail-in ballots. Neocons wanted AI gene modification improvements. NATO?

Expand full comment
Hedley Rees's avatar

Nice post Thomas, spot on! The point I try to make is that when a crime is committed, motive is secondary to collecting scene of the crime evidence. That existed/exists in the facilities that were producing drug substance and drug product. You will know well that FDA biologics inspectors went into a number of facilities, Wyeth Biopharma in particular (owned by Pfizer), which produced the initial 33 'emergency' batches. I have the Establishment Inspection Report provided to me through an FDA FOIA that proves without doubt that the facility was in a bad shape and in my opinion should have entered consent decree, or even closed down immediately.

So, the point is, real-world evidence has the potential to stop the shots, motive is irrelevant...

Expand full comment
Thomas Welch's avatar

There’s a war on. AI bioweapons are a real threat. Tax exempt salaries and research grants are at stake. OWS reputation here.

Expand full comment
Hilary Butler's avatar

You need to write a book.

I looked up Thomas Welch on amazon, and can't imagine that you would have written Valentine Gnomes Coloring book.

Expand full comment
Alison Conley's avatar

You’ve provided enough evidence the C19 rollout was based on funneling money to pharma and the injections are regulated by the FDA (not DOD) and by law, FD&C, must meet cGMP. Pharma’s pipelines had dried up, patents were expiring, and gene therapy was their last hope. From what I understand Covid was essentially a bailout. This is not the first time governments have bailed out industry. We’ve had bank and automobile bailouts prior to the Covid bailout. The big issue in bailing out pharma is you can’t circumvent 10-12 years due to cGMP because will cost lives.

I also have a question about Gilead and their drug Remdesivir. I heard Gilead had nothing new in their pipelines either. I believe they are the third largest biotech on the west coast after Genentech and Amgen. If they had collapsed this would likely have a significant impact on the W. Coast biotech market. If you have a collapse in a major market it impacts other markets negatively such as banking and real estate. They all tie together like a domino effect. Out of curiosity, do you have any added perspective on this as well in the UK?

Expand full comment
Hedley Rees's avatar

Gilead has invested $billions in gene modified cell therapy with nothing to show for it. Paid $11.9 billions in Kite Pharma in 2017: https://www.gilead.com/news/news-details/2017/gilead-sciences-to-acquire-kite-pharma-for-119-billion

…and Remdesivir is a dead duck now people know how dangerous it is - none of the big pharma companies have products that are safe and effective- thanks again Alison, you keep me sane :O)

Expand full comment
Hedley Rees's avatar

Also notice that Novartis’ Kymriah, another identical class of gene therapy, CAR T-cell for rare blood cancers, was approved by FDA around the same time - they now have FDA Black box warnings on them, side effects same a vaccines, well, well 🙃

Expand full comment
Alison Conley's avatar

Thanks for the added insight. Seems like a very risky investment. It sounds like Kite is similar to Moderna. Small biotech with no history of success or bringing products to market. Yet Gilead made a poor business decision and invested 11 billion in this small startup biotech company.

Expand full comment
Philip Antony Bevington's avatar

I am 85 live in Cornwall UK>My 32 year old son was killed by the Vax. The Government refuse to talk about this. I now see my Prime Minister making laws around 'balancing the books'. However not going after the rich or powerful. But attacking the poor, the weak, the sick, the homeless and vulnerable. All those who are an economic drain on Society. The ones who 'take financially and contribute nothing financially. The countries finances would be much healthier without them "

! I believe this to just be the start of reducing the population. But the remainder of the population will have much lowered living standards. Destitution will be very common and food will be restricted and scarce. Cheap crap may be prolific but decent food less so and very costly. A slow decline in living standards.

Expand full comment
Maurice McCarthy's avatar

Pretty much since the industrial revolution, and certainly since ~1880 when business had achieved a unified world economy, the productive capacity clearly exceeds the consumptive capacity of the producers. Therefore the entire economy would collapse if it were not for those who only consume - the young, the old and the sick. Therefore Harari's concept of "useless eater" is *entirely* false. There is no such thing and plenty of scope to give due dignity to the human being.

Expand full comment
Crixcyon's avatar

I firmly believe that there is a depopulation agenda working in full force. The most out-in-the-open part of the agenda was the fake covid pandemic. If covid was going to kill off tens or hundreds of millions, it would have done so because the mRNA poisons are 100% not safe and 100% not effective at saving anyone from anything.

We have seen from previous fake pandemics and virus scare tactics that none of these swarms-of-pathogens do much damage to anyone and it was never required that everyone on the planet become vaccinated.

This time, there was a monstrous push to get every person on the planet vaxxed multiple times. Why? Covid, if it was real, was not that harmful. The only reason, beyond the profit motive, was to infect everyone with a death juice. There is proof that mRNA is still reeking havoc in people 3-4 years after their injections. That is not normal. Where will we be in another 5 years?

The reason many of us not connected to the medical mafia or government or the MSM can see this is because we are not indoctrinated with big pharma dogma. The MSM, government, the FDA, CDC, HHS, and medical experts have all constantly lied over the last 63 months and are still doing so.

Look at the population trends for every country in the world. They are weakening and reversing and there has to be a reason for that. There may be several operations in play here from drugs to food to environment to 5G to excessive toxic chemicals everywhere. Listen to that murdering gates...his main reason for living is to push depopulation agendas. Depopulation schemes have been part of humanity for over 3,000 years.

Expand full comment
Laura Noncomplier's avatar

Depop, money, control, prepping for the next round. Each round goes further than the one before!

Expand full comment
Anti Lockdown Alliance's avatar

Its more war than health "care".

Expand full comment